Comments on: China Lawyers Unsure of Copyright Laws http://www.n-line.co.uk/2006/04/26/china_lawyers_unsure_of_copyright_laws/ a personal blog indulging in the unsolicited, uninvited, and often unwelcome views of yet another pesky foreigner... Sat, 19 May 2012 15:14:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: strange china laws http://www.n-line.co.uk/2006/04/26/china_lawyers_unsure_of_copyright_laws/#comment-24360 strange china laws Thu, 29 May 2008 01:51:52 +0000 http://www.n-line.co.uk/2006/04/26/china_lawyers_unsure_of_copyright_laws/#comment-24360 [...] to discover that his firm&8217s ... Along with china Law Blog and others, we&8217ve followed ...http://www.n-line.co.uk/2006/04/26/china_lawyers_unsure_of_copyright_laws/trackback/POLAND ?? a guinea pig? - Sunday - Catholic WeeklyIn this situation the introduction of toxic [...] [...] to discover that his firm&8217s … Along with china Law Blog and others, we&8217ve followed …http://www.n-line.co.uk/2006/04/26/china_lawyers_unsure_of_copyright_laws/trackback/POLAND ?? a guinea pig? - Sunday - Catholic WeeklyIn this situation the introduction of toxic [...]

]]> By: Asia Biz Law http://www.n-line.co.uk/2006/04/26/china_lawyers_unsure_of_copyright_laws/#comment-864 Asia Biz Law Sun, 30 Apr 2006 07:38:51 +0000 http://www.n-line.co.uk/2006/04/26/china_lawyers_unsure_of_copyright_laws/#comment-864 Along with China Law Blog and others, we've followed the developments on this irony closely. According to IP Dragon, Mr. Lehman of Lehman, Lee, and Xu (the firm running China Blawg) is a Who's Who of Chinese trademark law. Paired with the fact that China Blawg completely renovated their site within 24 hours of the media attention, it seems that Lehman, et al, were suckered by a lazy web designer. China Law Blog has expressed a sentiment of 'no hard feelings.' Cheers to the parties involved for effectuating a quick and civil solution. Along with China Law Blog and others, we’ve followed the developments on this irony closely. According to IP Dragon, Mr. Lehman of Lehman, Lee, and Xu (the firm running China Blawg) is a Who’s Who of Chinese trademark law. Paired with the fact that China Blawg completely renovated their site within 24 hours of the media attention, it seems that Lehman, et al, were suckered by a lazy web designer. China Law Blog has expressed a sentiment of ‘no hard feelings.’

Cheers to the parties involved for effectuating a quick and civil solution.

]]> By: Nick http://www.n-line.co.uk/2006/04/26/china_lawyers_unsure_of_copyright_laws/#comment-660 Nick Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:59:18 +0000 http://www.n-line.co.uk/2006/04/26/china_lawyers_unsure_of_copyright_laws/#comment-660 You are very welcome, I'm sure you'll get lots of trackbacks on this one... I thought I'd seen just about everything that could be copied, copied, now I know better :) Best of luck sorting it out. You are very welcome, I’m sure you’ll get lots of trackbacks on this one…
I thought I’d seen just about everything that could be copied, copied, now I know better :)

Best of luck sorting it out.

]]> By: China Law Blog http://www.n-line.co.uk/2006/04/26/china_lawyers_unsure_of_copyright_laws/#comment-659 China Law Blog Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:35:07 +0000 http://www.n-line.co.uk/2006/04/26/china_lawyers_unsure_of_copyright_laws/#comment-659 Thanks for running this post as it helps gets the word out and thanks, in particular, for documenting this. Strange thing is that I do not really think of any firm as a "competitor" as there is more than enough China work out there and there is only so much any one firm can do. We have very close relationships with a number of law firms throughout China, which, in many ways, makes this even more troubling. Thanks for running this post as it helps gets the word out and thanks, in particular, for documenting this. Strange thing is that I do not really think of any firm as a “competitor” as there is more than enough China work out there and there is only so much any one firm can do. We have very close relationships with a number of law firms throughout China, which, in many ways, makes this even more troubling.

]]>